Info

You are currently browsing the archives for the egg donation payment uk category.

Calendar
May 2012
M T W T F S S
« Apr    
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  
Categories

Archive for the egg donation payment uk Category

5 Year Egg Donation Review Reveals Interesting Pregnancy Statistics

After reviewing 5 years worth of data regarding its egg donation programmes CRM London has revealed some interesting trends specifically in relation to egg share donors. From 2007 to 2011 CRM London found that of those egg share donors who received free IVF treatment including free drug treatment, and donated half of their eggs to an anonymous recipient and kept the other half for their own IVF treatment, 42% have either delivered a baby, or are currently over 3 months pregnant. This was their chance of pregnancy for each treatment cycle. Some had several free treatment cycles and had a higher chance of pregnancy overall. This is from a group of 449 women who donated eggs and underwent fertility treatment in the London fertility clinic over the past 5 years.

It is when these results are compared with women of the same age, who were not donating eggs and keeping all the eggs for themselves that it becomes interesting. Of 804 women who did not donate eggs, a lower percentage of 38% are currently more than 3 months pregnant, or have delivered a baby. This shows that the egg sharers who have free IVF treatment and donate half of their eggs have better pregnancy results than IVF patients who pay for their treatment and use all of their eggs in treatment.

Why? It is most likely due to the fact that women who are accepted on the egg sharing programme have been screened to have high pregnancy potential based on blood tests and scans, whereas there are no selection criteria for self funded patients.

The research has also revealed that in recipients of donated eggs, 475 women had embryos resulting from donated eggs transferred at CRM London in this 5 year period. Of which, 44% have either delivered or are more than 3 months pregnant, showing that recipients have the most successful results of all, despite usually being of an older age group than the donors.

The trend can be accounted to 2 predominant factors. Firstly, the age of the donor determines the chances of pregnancy not the age of the recipient and secondly, both egg donors and patients having IVF treatment with their own eggs receive drugs to stimulate their ovaries to produce multiple eggs.

Treatment is therefore aimed at boosting the ovary. For recipients the ovaries are not stimulated at all and attention can be focused on improving the uterine factor to help embryos implant. It is also worth pointing out that these results are only based on pregnancies from fresh embryo transfer and do not include further pregnancies arising from the transfer of frozen embryos.

With the advent of paid egg donation it will be interesting to see whether the pregnancy rates are any different, particularly when paid egg donors who are not receiving any fertility treatment are considered. The stringent screening processes for paid donors and egg sharers should however, limit the variance in success rates.

Higher payment allowance for donor-assisted fertility treatment

 yourgreatlife lisa

Will a new, higher payment allowance have much impact on donor-assisted fertility treatment in the UK?

It’s all about the money, money, money when it comes to donor gametes, according to some in the fertility field.  Until now, the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) has limited compensation for egg and sperm donation to a maximum of £250, for reasonable expenses such as travel and loss of earnings, but has denied donors any other payment. However, a report to be published by the HFEA this week is expected to raise that maximum sum to £700.

The question of compensation for donor sperm and eggs has been hotly debated in the UK for years, from an ethical standpoint as well as a practical one. At one extreme, there are people who believe that payment for donor gametes amounts to the commercial trading of human flesh.  Others merely find the idea distasteful. The HFEA itself does not want to be seen to be creating a financial incentive to donate.  However, the other major consideration here is the one of supply and demand.  There has been a shortage of donor gametes in the UK, which many people believe is a result of the no-payment rules. This is not the case in countries like the USA, where payment is allowed.

The perspectives of both donor and recipient will, of course, be based upon more personal considerations. For those requiring donor gametes in order to have a baby the shortage of supply can be frustrating and the alternative route of going abroad for fertility treatment can be extremely expensive.  Donors must take into account the time, effort and discomfort involved in providing sperm or eggs.  Egg donation, in particular, involves the taking of hormone medication by injection for several weeks, and then an invasive procedure under general anaesthetic to retrieve the eggs. 

The change in HFEA regulations has the support of fertility industry groups, including the Nuffield Council on Bioethics and the British Fertility Society, according to an article in the Sunday Times. Nuffield Council on Bioethics likens donors to volunteers who test new medicines and suggests they be paid similarly. The British Fertility Society is more specific; suggesting fees of up to $1,000 for sperm donors and between £500 and £2,500 for egg donors in addition to a fixed amount of compensation for their discomfort and inconvenience.  It is unclear how much will actually be paid to donors of sperm or eggs, when the recipients are receiving free IVF through the NHS, and who will be responsible for that payment.

The proposed UK compensation scheme will almost certainly lead to an increase in the supply of donor gametes, if other countries’ models can be relied upon.  It means that someone who considers being a donor can weigh their reservations about the time and effort it will involve with the compensation they will receive.  No one is going to get wealthy on this scheme as the compensation isn’t overly generous and there are also regulations in place which limit the number of times a person can donate gametes.  The limited payments also means that people who must pursue private fertility treatment are not faced with enormous additional costs, but will probably benefit from a greater supply.  Look out for news of the changing HFEA regulations this week.

|